Divorce Judge Not Recused for Suggesting Husband Should Be in Drug Court
- At January 12, 2023
- By Miles Mason
- In Divorce Process
0
Tennessee case summary on judicial recusal in divorce. Roger Scott Austermiller v. Penny Smith Austermiller During the course of this Williamson County, Tennessee, divorce case, the trial judge, Chancellor Deanna Bell Johnson, after the husband failed a court-ordered drug test, commented that if she could put the husband in a two-year drug court program, she […]
Read More»Court OK Not Asking 13 Year Old’s Custody Preference
- At January 11, 2023
- By Miles Mason
- In Child Custody, Family Law
- 0
Tennessee child custody case summary on custody preference of 13 year old. In re Aiden W.L. The parents in this Shelby County, Tennessee, case were never married. They had four children during their relationship until separating in 2015, but the father later rescinded his admission of paternity of some of them. At the time of […]
Read More»Judge’s Order Recusing Himself Can’t Be Appealed Immediately
- At December 31, 2022
- By Miles Mason
- In Uncategorized
- 0
Tennessee case summary on recusal in divorce. Margaret Kathryn Young v. Larry Joe Young The wife in this Shelby County, Tennessee, case filed for divorce after 35 years of marriage. She challenged the validity of the antenuptial agreement signed the day before the marriage, and the question of the validity was heard at a hearing […]
Read More»Wife’s Claims of Abuse Found Not to Be Credible
Tennessee case summary on domestic violence in divorce. Paige Wininger v. Jarred Wininger The husband and wife in this Washington County, Tennessee, case were married in Tennessee in 2017 and had one daughter. In 2019, they moved to South Carolina, but in 2021, the wife left the marital home and returned to Tennessee with the […]
Read More»Maximum Participation Possible in Tennessee Custody Law
Maximum Participation Possible Commentary from Miles Mason, Sr. with perspectives from Anne Hamer and Abigail Hall. Tennessee Code Annotated Section 36–6–106(a) provides in pertinent part: In taking into account the child’s best interest, the court shall order a custody arrangement that permits both parents to enjoy the maximum participation possible in the life of the […]
Read More»
