Deadline Set for Walter Evans Chancery Court Bench Applications
- At December 20, 2020
- By Miles Mason
- In Uncategorized
0
At 9 a.m. on Tuesday, February 2, 2021, the Trial Court Vacancy Commission will hold a meeting in order to address filling the vacancy left by the Honorable Walter L. Evans upon his retirement from Chancery Court, Part I of the 30th Judicial District of Shelby County. Due to Covid-19, the hearing will be held virtually, […]
Read More»Causing Fire Doesn’t Count as a Substantial Contribution and Property Remains Other Spouse’s Separate Property
Ballard v. Ballard, No. M2008-00713-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2009). Before he met his future wife, Mr. Ballard purchased a home in his own name for $81,000. The same year he began dating Mrs. Ballard, he paid off the first mortgage on his home in full and obtained a second mortgage. After the parties […]
Read More»Dramatic Appreciation in Property Value Was Result of Freeway Coming Through and Not Spouse’s Substantial Contribution; Therefore Property Interest Remained Separate
Harrison v. Harrison, 912 S.W.2d 124 (Tenn. 1996). Mr. Harrison and his brother each inherited a half interest in a 45 ½ acre tract of land that was used for farming. At the time Mr. Harrison married Mrs. Harrison, the value of the land was $7,000. After an interstate was constructed across the tract of […]
Read More»Investment Advice and Use of Word “Ours” Were Insufficient to Transmute Wife’s Trust Fund
Luttrell v. Luttrell, No. W2012-02279-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2014). William and Beverly Luttrell were married in 1987 in Mississippi. The wife came from a well-to-do family, since her grandfather had started Bryan Foods, which later became part of the Sara Lee Corporation. Prior to the marriage, she was the beneficiary of a trust […]
Read More»Support During Marriage Was One Factor of Substantial Contribution When It Resulted in Preservation of Asset
Wade v. Wade, 897 S.W.2d 702 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) This 1994 case involved a number of different pieces of property which the court was required to classify as separate or marital. These had been owned by the husband prior to the marriage, and the husband argued that they had remained his separate property. One […]
Read More»
